🔗 Share this article

I possess some thoughts about that remarks made by the sports network commentator a well-known announcer following Novak Djokovic's win over Taylor Fritz during the New York major last eight. Consider – the athlete represents the United States, Fowler is American – and athletic competitions often encourage patriotic sentiment. Some letdown would have been understandable. Instead, Fowler invoked the continued drought of US male players at the majors: not one of them has won a title since the last American champion in 2003, and he had been the last one standing in the competition.

Everyone enjoy a narrative, myself included. But come on. Suppose Fritz defeated Djokovic for the first time, force of nature the Spanish star was waiting in the next round, whom he has never defeated in an competitive encounter. And had he somehow survived that, it would have been defending champion Jannik Sinner, versus him the American had lost 10 of the previous eleven sets. The two young stars had also divided the last seven major titles (and Alcaraz proceeded to defeat a tired Serbian in the subsequent match). Fritz said in post-match interviews following his defeat that he actually preferred his draw, because it offered the opportunity to beat the three best players in the sport in succession. He is well within his right to aim for the achievement; an athlete is meant to have faith in themselves. But going into that Serbian quarter-final what other person in their right mind had the drought of American champions on the brain?

The American star's weaker delivery the only thing standing in her way and sustained success

Fritz, twenty-eight, is placed fourth in the world starting the upcoming ATP World Tour Finals and has secured his last six encounters over third-ranked Alexander Zverev with growing comfort. It's likely he could take that spot for himself in the future. But it’s clear that right now, that’s as high as he can climb: Sinner and Alcaraz lie a chasm of performance metrics away. Fritz’s top-class delivery and concussive strength on each front side and backhand are sufficiently enough to dispose of most rivals on the professional circuit. Against the handful of once-in-a-lifetime players, however, Fritz is often helpless. The past few seasons has witnessed the curious rise of tall, gangly athletes who can nonetheless cover the court with the surprising speed and fluidity of smaller men. Fritz is 6ft 5ins and appears that way. His footwork is stiff, as if he hasn't fully adapted to his limbs. So he’ll rarely win a rally that the opponent was dictating, and hitting a soft shot against him is typically a reliable tactic. That serves as a pretty harsh limitation on his potential.

Fritz has made a number of dramatic, improbable improvements throughout his career. Early on of the decade, he was hovering around the bottom of the world's best thirty. Two years later, he was approaching the elite ten. Last year, he unexpectedly surged up to No 4 – and held the spot. But the next leap, mixing it up with and beating legendary figures like the young Spaniard, the Italian, and even a declining Serbian, is the toughest of all. What could the commentator have been thinking? That the American, in 2025, was a serious threat to beat them all back-to-back? That it was appropriate mentioning the continuing drought of US male players lifting grand slams when he had exited the New York major in the quarter-finals? The thirst is simply too much and the respect for the magnitude of the challenge too little.

Taylor Fritz made a personal best run to the Wimbledon last four in July.

Fritz’s play in that very last eight match should have been sufficient of an sign. Djokovic triumphed in four sets, a win that only seemed tenuous for brief periods towards the conclusion, when Fritz had survived a couple match points and had a opportunity to hold for 5-5. The pair appeared evenly matched during the rallies, with the American earning plenty of opportunities to win the opponent's serve. But the champion rescued service break opportunity after break point, extending the run to the brink of frustration. When Fritz eventually did claim a single of the opportunities at 5-5 in the second set, he promptly played a horrendous game to drop serve again; Djokovic had drawn him into a battle peripheral to the real battle and forced him to use far too much effort to win it. Down match points in the last game, his first serve sailed to heaven. He prolonged the contest two times on his backup delivery, but finally committed two errors. It wasn’t a collapse, I didn’t think, just a consequence of needing to hit too many second serves.

The match was fairly compelling proof that the American is not good enough to defeat any form of the Serbian, that was defeated by Alcaraz in the next round and did not particularly seem like he thought he could triumph. This is absolutely fine – Djokovic is the greatest of all time, and may not be at the height of his athletic abilities now, but has acquired enough experience and tactical know-how to compensate for a significant portion of the drop-off. The issue is the individuals who were expecting the American to prevail, and pressuring him to do so, when he was yet to accomplished anything that suggested he would.

The American is an valuable contributor to the tour regardless. He’s a patient, thoughtful voice in media sessions, more so than virtually anyone on the ATP except for the Russian star, prepared to not only say how he feels or the tactic he believed decided a contest, but clarify it. That he ought to shoulder the majority of the responsibility for the United States not spawn a male major champion since the last American titlist feels unjust. (Since Ben Shelton is competing alongside him in the rankings, perhaps they can share that load.)

Year-End Championships: Singles Groups

Jimmy Connors Group

• Carlos Alcaraz (Sp)
• Taylor Fritz (US)
• The Australian speedster
• The Italian stylist

Bjorn Borg Group

• Jannik Sinner (It)
• The German powerhouse
• Ben Shelton (US)
• The Canadian talent

“I would likely dwell on it indefinitely if I don’t do it,” Fritz informed a journalist in the summer of claiming a major. I hope he realizes that he’s not unsuccessful if he does not achieve that goal, that overcoming Alcaraz and Sinner’s dominant, formidable empire is actually highly improbable for all other players. {